Skip to content
A wooden treasure chest opening with glowing purple aura, gold coins streaming in from above.A wooden treasure chest opening with glowing purple aura, gold coins streaming in from above.A wooden treasure chest opening with glowing purple aura, gold coins streaming in from above.A wooden treasure chest opening with glowing purple aura, gold coins streaming in from above.
ValidatedHLP

Hyperliquid Yield

HLP · Hyperliquid HLP Vault

DeFi market-making / liquidity-provision vault

Clears the descriptive hurdle: Sharpe 1.72, PF 9.96, −5.8% max drawdown — roughly 2× BTC's return at half the volatility and an eighth of the drawdown. Qualifies as a benchmark and satellite allocation, with explicit directional and smart-contract risk caveats.

Category
DeFi
Window
2023–2026 (~3.1y, 91 biweekly obs)
Instruments
Hyperliquid HLP vault
Timeframe
Biweekly NAV
Tested
2026-06-21

Measured equity history

Recorded directly from the chronological test ledger.

92 points

Shown in the backtest's native equity or cumulative P&L units. It is not scaled to an investment amount because the published artifact does not provide a defensible capital denominator.

9.96Profit factor
1.72Sharpe
-5.8%Max drawdown
87.9%Win rate
91 biweekly observationsSample
Not runGates passed
Not runPlacebo

How it works

  1. The bet

    What market behavior this strategy is wagering on.

    It wagers that providing liquidity and market-making across Hyperliquid's perpetual order books earns a persistent premium — bid-ask spread capture plus funding flows — that compensates the vault for absorbing trader order flow and inventory risk over time.

  2. How it decides

    What makes it enter, size, and exit a position.

    Capital is pooled into the protocol's HLP vault, which automatically quotes both sides of the book and takes the counter-position to aggregate trader flow. There is no manual entry or exit; deposits earn the book's net market-making and funding return, subject to a 4-day withdrawal lockup.

  3. How it can break

    The regimes and failure modes that turn the edge negative.

    The edge turns negative when the book holds a large directional inventory into a sharp adverse move, as in the March 2025 JELLY incident. Low-volume, low-funding regimes compress returns toward the reported APR, and smart-contract, bridge, or oracle exploits are tail risks borne by depositors.

Explainer compiled 2026-06-28 · opus-4.8

🤖 Install with AIA portable skill file any LLM can run — verdict, config and risk controls baked in.
Download .mdPreview

Deployment guides

Step-by-step setup for this strategy, by broker.

Deploy on HyperliquidHyperliquid web/API
Deploy on BinanceBinance API

The first validated instrument

Hyperliquid’s HLP (Hyperliquidity Provider) vault is the first instrument in the program to clear the validation hurdle. Measured flow-neutral from the protocol’s own vaultDetails over its full available history (2023-05 → 2026-06, 91 biweekly observations), HLP delivered:

Asset Ann. Return Ann. Vol Sharpe (rf=5%) Max DD PF
HLP 58.8% 24.2% 1.72 −5.8% 9.96
BTC buy-and-hold 31.3% 42.9% 0.66 −48.7% 1.52
USDC 5% APY 5.6% 0.0% 0.0%
50/50 BTC+USDC 20.7% 21.3% 0.66 −25.6% 1.62

Against the hurdle (PF > 1.20 and Sharpe > 0.6), HLP clears — roughly twice BTC’s return at half the volatility and an eighth of the drawdown. And it is not a small-NAV mirage: excluding the first eight small-NAV periods, CAGR is still 59.8%, and mature periods at $500M+ NAV sustain it.

Why “clears the hurdle” ≠ “deposit naively”

This is a validated benchmark and satellite allocation, not a risk-free yield. The honest caveats travel with the number:

  1. Directional book. HLP is a market-making / liquidity-provision vault, not delta-neutral. It can take large hits (the JELLY episode, March 2025) and is backstopped by the protocol, not by you.
  2. Regime. The window is a high-volume, high-funding bull market; forward returns will mean-revert toward the lower currently-reported APR.
  3. Smart-contract & venue risk. A young L1 + on-chain perp DEX: bridge/contract exploit, oracle manipulation, and the HLP backstop socializing losses are real tail risks. A 4-day withdrawal lockup applies.

HLP is the benchmark the delta-neutral funding-rate harvest is judged against — the harvest aims to capture a related premium without HLP’s directional and backstop exposure.

Verdict: VALIDATED as a satellite allocation. HLP clears the Sharpe-and-PF hurdle with a strong, robust record — but it is a directional DeFi book with real smart-contract and regime risk, sized accordingly, not a naive deposit.

Charts & evidence

Hyperliquid HLP cumulative return vs BTC and USDC benchmarks
HLP vs benchmarks: ~2× BTC's return at half the vol and an eighth of the drawdown over 2023–2026.

Frequently asked

What are the historical returns of the Hyperliquid HLP vault?

Over its full available history (2023-05 to 2026-06, ~3.1 years, 91 biweekly observations) the Hyperliquid HLP vault returned about 58.8% annualized at 24.2% volatility — a Sharpe of 1.72 (rf=5%), a profit factor of 9.96, and a −5.8% max drawdown. That is roughly twice BTC buy-and-hold's return at about half the volatility and an eighth of the drawdown. It is not an early small-NAV artifact: excluding the first eight small-NAV periods, the CAGR is still 59.8%.

Is depositing into Hyperliquid HLP risk-free?

No. HLP clears the validation hurdle as a benchmark and satellite allocation, but it is a directional liquidity-provision and market-making book, not a delta-neutral deposit. It can take large hits (for example the JELLY incident in March 2025) and is backstopped by the protocol rather than by you. The measured window is also a high-volume, high-funding bull regime, so forward returns should mean-revert toward the lower currently-reported APR. Smart-contract, bridge and 4-day withdrawal-lockup risks apply to every dollar.

Methodology: Independent research screen — the full 11-gate battery was not run; data and execution limits are stated in the report. Full reproducible report: research/hyperliquid_funding/REPORT.md in the source repository.Author: Validated Research Team (Methodology v1.0 — 11-gate validation). Backtests are not investment advice.