Skip to content

Research program · specification published

Does following a person still work after everyone can see the trade?

Public disclosures can be tested as strategy inputs. Validated records when an action happened, when it became public, and the first realistic follower price. A famous name, a screenshot, or a profitable holding is not a verdict.

No person-level strategy has been validated in this program yet. Existing insider cohort records must be reproduced from point-in-time filings before they can advance.

Signal lanes

Different people create different data problems.

The sources are not combined into one popularity score. Each lane keeps its own identity standard, reporting delay, and executable test.

01First media profile seeded

Public investors

Primary feed
Podcasts, interviews, newsletters, and dated social posts
Known delay
Public immediately; trade timing and position size may be unknown
First test
Separate thesis mentions from claimed trades, then enter only after publication
02Cohort candidates exist; person-level validation pending

Corporate insiders

Primary feed
SEC Forms 3, 4 and 5
Known delay
Usually up to 2 business days
First test
Open-market purchases by role, size, clustering, and prior buying history
03Source mapping pending

Elected officials

Primary feed
Official periodic transaction reports
Known delay
Disclosure can arrive weeks after the trade
First test
Trade only after the filing becomes public; preserve reported value ranges
04Research design pending

Institutional managers

Primary feed
SEC Form 13F
Known delay
Up to 45 days after quarter end
First test
Position changes, concentration, persistence, and overlap—not assumed entry prices
05Identity and execution controls pending

Public on-chain accounts

Primary feed
Venue and chain events
Known delay
Near real time, identity confidence varies
First test
Executable follower fills after detection, including fees, slippage, and address drift

First tracked investor

A source ledger, not a fan page.

Profiles begin with timestamped claims. They earn stronger labels only when the position evidence and later outcome can be reproduced.

media seeded

Chris Camillo

Public investor associated with social-arbitrage research and occasional high-conviction position discussions.

SnappleshortedAMZNaddedBEtrimmedHOODbullish
Open source ledger
tracking

Leopold Aschenbrenner

AI-focused investor and managing partner associated with Situational Awareness LP; public U.S. holdings are disclosed quarterly through SEC filings.

Situational Awareness LP Q1 2026 holdingsownedSituational Awareness LP Q4 2025 holdingsownedSituational Awareness LP Q3 2025 holdingsowned
Open source ledger

Point-in-time protocol

The public timestamp is the starting gun.

A backtest fails if it trades on the private transaction date when the disclosure arrived later. Every candidate must clear these controls before any performance ranking is shown.

G1Identity

Can the activity be attributed to the same public source without guessing?

G2Availability

What exact time did the information become public and machine-readable?

G3Executability

What price could a follower obtain after publication, with costs and liquidity?

G4Selection

Was the person or cohort chosen before the holdout period began?

G5Persistence

Does the signal survive new periods, different regimes, and source inactivity?

G6Attribution

Is performance distinct from market, sector, size, momentum, and concentration exposure?

Current evidence

Start with the existing insider cohort, then earn the right to name people.

Next executable slice
  1. Ingest raw SEC insider filings with filing timestamps and amendments.
  2. Normalize only open-market purchases; separate grants, options, gifts, and planned sales.
  3. Freeze cohort rules for role, purchase size, clustering, and prior history.
  4. Enter on the next tradable bar after publication and include costs.
  5. Hold out the newest chronological period before ranking any source.

Until that replay is complete, the catalog’s existing insider records remain discovery candidates—not person-level proof and not a recommendation to mirror a trade.