Skip to content
PCA strategy avatar
InconclusivePCA

Polymarket Up/Down Complement Discount

Paired-outcome complement discount

Inconclusive, strongest candidate — 1,716 first-seen paired prints implied +2.82% average after stated fees and held up chronologically, but historical prints do not prove simultaneous two-leg fills. Live atomic paper execution is required.

Category
Prediction markets
Window
2026-05-27 → 2026-06-24
Instruments
Polymarket crypto Up/Down
Timeframe
15-minute event markets
Tested
2026-06-24

Measured equity history

Recorded directly from the chronological test ledger.

24 points

Shown in the backtest's native equity or cumulative P&L units. It is not scaled to an investment amount because the published artifact does not provide a defensible capital denominator.

Not measuredProfit factor
Not measuredSharpe
Not measuredMax drawdown
100.0%Win rate
1,716Trades
3/11Gates passed
Not runPlacebo

How it works

Backfilling
  1. The bet

    What market behavior this strategy is wagering on.

    Plain-English explainer is backfilling — check back tomorrow. We publish the explanation only once it's written and reviewed, never auto-filled.

  2. How it decides

    What makes it enter, size, and exit a position.

    Plain-English explainer is backfilling — check back tomorrow. We publish the explanation only once it's written and reviewed, never auto-filled.

  3. How it can break

    The regimes and failure modes that turn the edge negative.

    Plain-English explainer is backfilling — check back tomorrow. We publish the explanation only once it's written and reviewed, never auto-filled.

Gate scorecard — 3 / 11

auto-imported from results.json
#GateResultPass
01Minimum sample1,716 first qualifying paired-print events.
02Profit factor ≥ 1.20Lossless theoretical settlement makes PF undefined; mean gross return is the relevant screen metric.
03Sharpe ≥ 0.6Not reported for overlapping binary markets.
04Max drawdown ≤ 12%No simultaneous-fill or capital-lockup model.
05Positive ≥ 60% of periodsOnly four weeks of data.
06Bootstrap LB Sharpe > 0Holdout mean-return interval is +2.43% to +3.27% under the paired-print assumption.
07Placebo beats p95Not run.
082× cost stress PF > 1.0Two cents additional slippage per leg produces -1.25% mean return.
09Deflated Sharpe positiveNot evaluated.
10No component > 40%Not evaluated by coin and week.
11Walk-forward OOS ≥ 0.9× ISHoldout mean +2.83% closely matches training +2.82%.

VERDICT: INCONCLUSIVE — APPARENT EDGE NEEDS SIMULTANEOUS-FILL PROOF

Buying both Up and Down for a combined cost below $1 guarantees a $1 settlement payout. This screen paired the first actual Up and Down taker-buy prints within one second whose prices plus stated fees totaled less than $1. It deliberately avoids choosing the cheapest later pair with hindsight.

The screen found 1,716 events. The average implied return was +2.82%; the untouched 680-event holdout averaged +2.83%, with a 95% bootstrap interval of +2.43% to +3.27%. Median available paired size was only about five shares.

Sample Events Mean implied return Median implied return
Training 1,036 +2.82%
Holdout 680 +2.83%
Combined 1,716 +2.82% +1.53%

This is the strongest candidate, but it is not yet validated. Two historical prints within one second do not prove that one trader could fill both legs before either quote moved. An added 1¢ per leg leaves only +0.74% average and makes the median trade negative; 2¢ per leg reduces the mean to −1.25%.

The required next test is a live atomic paper executor that records both IOC outcomes, partial fills, latency, fees, and stranded-leg losses. Advance only if at least 200 paired attempts retain a positive lower confidence bound after every failed-leg cost.

Screened 1.12 million taker-buy prints across 7,267 15-minute markets from 2026-05-27 through 2026-06-24.

Frequently asked

Is Polymarket Up/Down Complement Discount profitable in 2026?

It is currently running through the 11-gate battery; the verdict will be published on this page, pass or fail.

Has Polymarket Up/Down Complement Discount been backtested honestly?

Yes — through The Validation Gauntlet, a pre-registered 11-gate framework (profit factor, deflated Sharpe, a random-permutation placebo, cost-stress and walk-forward) with the specification locked before any out-of-sample metric is computed.

Methodology: 11-gate validation — pre-registered spec, 11-gate battery, real market data. Full reproducible report: backtests/polymarket_complement_arbitrage/REPORT.md in the source repository.Author: Validated Research Team (Methodology v1.0 — 11-gate validation). Backtests are not investment advice.