Skip to content
SFB strategy avatar
InconclusiveSFB

Soccer Closing-Odds Favorite Bias

Closing-odds favorite bias

Inconclusive — PF 1.06 across 3,499 bets fell to 1.02 on the chronological holdout. The confidence interval includes zero and the result depends on obtaining the archived best quote.

Category
Sports betting
Window
2019-08-10 → 2025-05-25
Instruments
European soccer 1X2
Timeframe
Pre-match closing odds
Tested
2025-05-25

Measured equity history

Recorded directly from the chronological test ledger.

240 points

Shown in the backtest's native equity or cumulative P&L units. It is not scaled to an investment amount because the published artifact does not provide a defensible capital denominator.

1.06Profit factor
Not measuredSharpe
-29.4%Max drawdown
63.3%Win rate
3,499Trades
2/5Gates passed
Not runPlacebo

How it works

Backfilling
  1. The bet

    What market behavior this strategy is wagering on.

    Plain-English explainer is backfilling — check back tomorrow. We publish the explanation only once it's written and reviewed, never auto-filled.

  2. How it decides

    What makes it enter, size, and exit a position.

    Plain-English explainer is backfilling — check back tomorrow. We publish the explanation only once it's written and reviewed, never auto-filled.

  3. How it can break

    The regimes and failure modes that turn the edge negative.

    Plain-English explainer is backfilling — check back tomorrow. We publish the explanation only once it's written and reviewed, never auto-filled.

Gate scorecard — 2 / 5

auto-imported from results.json
#GateResultPass
01Minimum samplen=3499
02Profit factor ≥ 1.20PF=1.062
04Max drawdown ≤ 12%Max DD=-29.4%
06Bootstrap LB Sharpe > 095% mean-PnL CI=[-0.0033666761931980572, 0.04927979422692197]
11Walk-forward OOS ≥ 0.9× ISHoldout ROI=0.74%

VERDICT: INCONCLUSIVE

The screen found a small positive result, but not a validated edge. Betting the shortest consensus-priced outcome when average closing odds were 1.35–1.80 produced PF 1.06 and +2.27% ROI across 3,499 matches. The untouched final 30% weakened to PF 1.02 and +0.74% ROI. The bootstrap confidence interval includes zero, max drawdown reached −29.4%, and a one-cent execution stress reduced PF to 1.03.

Rule

  • Five major European soccer leagues; the requested archive covers 2015/16–2024/25, while complete average/best quote fields yielded eligible bets from 2019/20 onward.
  • Select the home, draw, or away outcome with the lowest market-average closing odds.
  • Enter only when those odds are between 1.35 and 1.80.
  • Use the best recorded closing quote and risk 1% of current bankroll per bet.
  • Keep the final 30% of qualifying matches as a chronological holdout.

Results

Sample Bets Win rate PF ROI per bet
Full 3,499 63.3% 1.062 +2.27%
Holdout 1,050 62.3% 1.020 +0.74%

This is closer to best-price shopping than a durable favorite anomaly. It is not strong enough for capital: the holdout edge is tiny, statistical uncertainty crosses zero, and the result depends on obtaining the archive’s best listed quote.

Data limits

Football-Data supplies closing snapshots, not time-stamped executable order books. Best-price availability, stake limits, voids, and account restrictions are not modeled. A credible next test needs forward quote capture from the Validated sportsbook router.

Frequently asked

Is Soccer Closing-Odds Favorite Bias profitable in 2026?

In this pre-registered backtest (2019-08-10 → 2025-05-25), Soccer Closing-Odds Favorite Bias returned a profit factor of 1.06 and passed 2/5 validation gates (placebo N/A). Verdict: INCONCLUSIVE. Every result is published, pass or fail.

Has Soccer Closing-Odds Favorite Bias been backtested honestly?

Yes — through The Validation Gauntlet, a pre-registered 11-gate framework (profit factor, deflated Sharpe, a random-permutation placebo, cost-stress and walk-forward) with the specification locked before any out-of-sample metric is computed.

Methodology: 11-gate validation — pre-registered spec, 5-gate battery, real market data. Full reproducible report: backtests/sports_favorite_bias/REPORT.md in the source repository.Author: Validated Research Team (Methodology v1.0 — 11-gate validation). Backtests are not investment advice.