Skip to content
BFC strategy avatar
InconclusiveBFC

BTC 15-Minute Favorite Continuation

Short-horizon binary favorite continuation

Inconclusive — the original underdog rebound failed. A directionally opposite favorite-continuation rule produced PF 1.21 across 182 trades and PF 1.56 on the chronological holdout, but its bootstrap lower bound is negative and 2× cost stress fails. Advance to frozen-rule paper trading; no capital.

Category
Prediction markets
Window
2026-03-14 → 2026-04-25
Instruments
Polymarket BTC Up/Down
Timeframe
15-minute event markets
Tested
2026-04-25

Measured equity history

Recorded directly from the chronological test ledger.

24 points

Shown in the backtest's native equity or cumulative P&L units. It is not scaled to an investment amount because the published artifact does not provide a defensible capital denominator.

1.21Profit factor
Not measuredSharpe
Not measuredMax drawdown
73.6%Win rate
182Trades
3/11Gates passed
Not runPlacebo

How it works

Backfilling
  1. The bet

    What market behavior this strategy is wagering on.

    Plain-English explainer is backfilling — check back tomorrow. We publish the explanation only once it's written and reviewed, never auto-filled.

  2. How it decides

    What makes it enter, size, and exit a position.

    Plain-English explainer is backfilling — check back tomorrow. We publish the explanation only once it's written and reviewed, never auto-filled.

  3. How it can break

    The regimes and failure modes that turn the edge negative.

    Plain-English explainer is backfilling — check back tomorrow. We publish the explanation only once it's written and reviewed, never auto-filled.

Gate scorecard — 3 / 11

auto-imported from results.json
#GateResultPass
01Minimum sample182 combined trades, including 45 chronological holdout trades.
02Profit factor ≥ 1.20Combined PF 1.212 after one-cent-per-side execution haircut.
03Sharpe ≥ 0.6NOT EVALUABLE: six-week event sample cannot support honest annualization.
04Max drawdown ≤ 12%NOT EVALUABLE: no preregistered account-sizing model.
05Positive ≥ 60% of periodsNOT EVALUABLE: only six weeks of history.
06Bootstrap LB Sharpe > 0FAIL: combined mean-return 95% bootstrap interval is -1.07% to +2.82%.
07Placebo beats p95NOT RUN: requires preregistered market-block placebo.
082× cost stress PF > 1.0FAIL: two-cent-per-side stress PF 0.752, mean return -1.25%.
09Deflated Sharpe positiveNOT EVALUABLE: standard multiple-testing correction not run.
10No component > 40%FAIL: best week contributes 41.4% of positive weekly P/L.
11Walk-forward OOS ≥ 0.9× ISPASS: holdout PF 1.56 exceeds 0.9x training PF 1.14.

VERDICT: INCONCLUSIVE — PROMISING HOLDOUT, NOT YET SIGNIFICANT

The original underdog-rebound hypothesis failed. Buying either side below 10 cents between minutes 5 and 10 remained negative across every tested threshold and rebound target, including before the conservative execution haircut.

The opposite rule was more promising: buy the 85–95 cent favorite between minutes 7 and 8, exit at 99 cents, stop at 80 cents, or force an exit at minute 14. With a one-cent adverse haircut at both entry and exit, favorite continuation produced PF 1.14 on the first 70% of markets and PF 1.56 on the untouched final 30%.

That supports a frozen-rule forward paper test, not a validated verdict. The combined bootstrap interval crosses zero, the sample spans only six weeks, the placebo was not run, and doubling the execution haircut turns the result negative.

What was tested

  • 3,085 usable public Polymarket BTC 15-minute markets from 2026-03-14 through 2026-04-25.
  • Chronological split: first 70% for rule-family selection, final 30% untouched.
  • One trade per market; entry from 0.85 through 0.95 during minute 7–8.
  • Exit at 0.99, stop at 0.80, otherwise first observation at/after minute 14.
  • Execution haircut: +0.01 to entry and −0.01 from exit.

Results

Sample Trades Win rate Mean return Median return Profit factor 95% bootstrap interval
Training 137 72.3% +0.66% +5.35% 1.14 −1.81% to +2.96%
Holdout 45 77.8% +1.83% +5.35% 1.56 −1.78% to +4.88%
Combined 182 73.6% +0.95% +5.35% 1.21 −1.07% to +2.82%

Why the rebound failed

Contracts below 10 cents usually continued decaying. The best evolved rebound rule still lost about 12% per trade on the holdout before the conservative execution haircut. Entry bands, timing, fresh-low confirmation, stops, and earlier forced exits did not reverse the result.

The sample instead favored persistence. By minutes 7–8, a side already priced at 85–95 cents often remained dominant through minute 14. This is a different archetype, not a cosmetic parameter change.

11-gate scorecard

Gate Status Detail
G1 minimum sample PASS 182 combined observations, including 45 untouched holdout trades.
G2 PF ≥ 1.20 net of costs PASS Combined PF 1.212 after the one-cent-per-side haircut.
G3 Sharpe ≥ 0.6 NOT EVALUABLE Six-week event sample is not an honest annualized equity record.
G4 max drawdown ≤ 12% NOT EVALUABLE No preregistered account sizing model.
G5 positive in ≥60% of years NOT EVALUABLE Only six weeks of history.
G6 bootstrap lower bound >0 FAIL Combined 95% interval is −1.07% to +2.82%.
G7 placebo beats p95 NOT RUN Requires a preregistered market-block placebo.
G8 2× cost PF >1.0 FAIL Two-cent-per-side stress produces PF 0.752 and −1.25% mean return.
G9 DSR / multiple testing NOT EVALUABLE Standard multiple-testing correction was not run.
G10 concentration ≤40% FAIL Best week contributes 41.4% of positive weekly P/L.
G11 holdout persistence PASS Holdout PF 1.56 exceeds 0.9× training PF 1.14.

Data and execution caveats

The source contains minute-resolution observed outcome prices, not guaranteed fills. Targets can occur between samples, while displayed observations may not be executable at the modeled size. Final validation needs side-specific CLOB bids/asks, depth, actual fees, partial-fill handling, Chainlink opening/current prices, and immutable resolution records.

Next step

Freeze v1 and paper trade it for at least 200 signals or 30 calendar days, whichever is longer. Pass only with at least 100 completed trades, PF ≥1.20 net of actual costs, a positive bootstrap lower bound, and no week contributing more than 40% of profit. Do not tune during collection and do not deploy capital before a clean pass.


Generated 2026-07-19. Public historical observations; no claim of executable fills.

Frequently asked

Did the BTC 15-minute underdog rebound strategy work?

No. Contracts below 10 cents usually continued decaying, and the evolved rebound variants remained negative on the chronological holdout.

Is favorite continuation validated?

No. It produced PF 1.21 across 182 trades and PF 1.56 on the untouched holdout after a one-cent-per-side haircut, but its bootstrap lower bound is negative, its 2× cost stress fails, and the placebo was not run. It is a frozen-rule paper-trading candidate.

Methodology: 11-gate validation — pre-registered spec, 11-gate battery, real market data. Full reproducible report: backtests/btc15_favorite_continuation/REPORT.md in the source repository.Author: Validated Research Team (Methodology v1.0 — 11-gate validation). Backtests are not investment advice.